The Disraeli Room
The Disraeli Room
The Customer and the Citizen
On the limits of government imitating business
Election, Election, Election
How true community empowement can counteract Britain's democratic disengagement
Poverty, Politics and Brain Size
ResPublica's Sandra Gruescu questions the emerging consensus on and use of neuroscience in parenting
A Psephological Quandry
A pragmatist's view of the electoral reform debate
Liberty, Innovation, and an Invitation
ResPublica's Deputy Director, Asheem Singh, on the radical future of our most ancient freedoms
Dancing On A Pin Head
Author and ResPublica Fellow, Jules Peck, analyses Phillip Blond's debate with Charlie Leadbeater at the 'Names Not Numbers' event
Civil Partnerships: An Opportunity And A Test
Oxford University Don and NextLeft contributor, Stuart White, opens a Disraeli Room cross-party debate on the equalities bill, civil partnerships and religious liberty with a call to action
The Assault On British Liberty
Where left and right are getting it wrong on civil liberties - and how an approach that places civil society at its heart could be the answer
The Climate Conundrum
Why discourse on climate change needs to step away from the scandals - and the stereotypes
AV It!
The Great Electoral Reform Debate Part Two: Director of Research at the Electoral Reform Society, Lewis Baston, with a withering piece directed at opponents of real electoral reform
About the Disraeli Room
The Disraeli Room is ResPublica’s blog, dedicated to radical, progressive ideas and analysis. ResPublica’s experts, fellows and friends of all political stripes from the worlds of policy making, social innovation and entrepreneurship meet here to swap ideas, debate and provoke.
Tag Cloud
Monthly archive
- March 2010 (6)
- February 2010 (20)
- November 2009 (1)
Most read blog posts
-
At ResPublica we are hugely excited about the official launch of our think tank. We have been overwhelmed by the interest shown and look forward to having a really good time and commencing our work with a flourish. In advance of all that, here is a small selection of some of the nice things that some of the newspapers have said about us so far...
-
"...What is the problem with the Rawlsian model as regards delivering equality? The following I think: Rawls is bound to be limited to equality of opportunity and this leads to an aporia. It’s true that he expands liberalism to include levelling out of disadvantages of birth etc but only in the interests of a Lockean or Kantian equality of negative freedom. Why is this aporetic? Because logically it would require one to abolish in every generation for the children the acquired and legitimate meritocratic differentials established by their parents..."
-
"...virtue is to do with ethos and education (politics for the sake of paideia and not the other way around); the alternative is virtue as tarted-up merit - and so any idea that there might be a 'national virtue panel' is hardly exhaustive! What Blond and I are talking about is a total shift in ethos at every level. This would include trying to build good ethical practice into the way the market operates. Such could be achieved partly by example – firms that are co-ops between owners, workers and consumers can win out in the long run by crowding out bad practice. This is because people will support fair treatment, better products at fairer prices - and so on..."




