The Disraeli Room

The Disraeli Room

Blog Post

The economic impacts of a Brexit would make us more, not less, reliant on other countries

21st June 2016

Yesterday’s letter from Ford to its employees was the latest chapter in the economic debate on Britain’s EU membership, which has largely focused on the impact of Brexit on the UK’s big manufacturers. But it’s services exports that we should be worried about if we vote to Leave on Thursday. Brexit could increase, not reduce, our reliance on inflows of foreign capital, and trigger another recession.

The economic debate on our EU membership tends to centre around trade. The big picture on trade for Britain at the moment isn’t great – our current account deficit is at a record high. The gap between the value of our imports and that of our exports is higher than it has been since World War Two.

The current account deficit is important because it increases our reliance on external financing to close the gap. That’s ok as long as you are not excessively reliant on short-term funding – particularly short-term bank borrowing, which can leave a country vulnerable to a sudden loss of lender confidence and lead to a currency crisis. A quick look at recent British economic history tells you this isn’t as unlikely as it sounds – the IMF crisis of 1976 and the ERM crisis of the early 1990s being prime examples.

So the issue underlying much of the economic discussion is whether Brexit would help close our trade gap overall – or make things worse. So far, Britain has been able to finance its current account deficit because of the stability of our macroeconomic position, and our continuing openness to trade and investment – secured within Europe by our EU membership. The uncertainty around what Brexit would mean for that openness means that it’s not hard to imagine a scenario in which leaving the EU makes it harder to finance our current account deficit.

The other impact is likely to be on the size of the deficit. Our EU membership is disproportionately important to our services exports – because market access for services within the EU is more secure than under the World Trade Organisation regime. As ONS graphic below shows, half of our services exports (total value £59 billion) are to Europe.


And although last year Britain’s current account deficit was £92.9 billion, our services sector generated a £28.6 billion surplus. Anything that harmed the terms of trade for our services exports risks outweighing the small benefit (as we identified in our Make or Break report last year) of a likely currency depreciation for manufacturing exports.

Taking ourselves out of the EU could therefore put the success story of Britain’s export economy – high value services such as banking, law, IT and transport – of the last couple of decades in danger. And that would mean an increased reliance on foreign capital inflows to bridge the gap. As I’ve already explained, attracting the ‘good’ forms of external financing would become more difficult. Instead, as the Treasury had to do in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, we will probably have to turn to short-term bank funding, which would increase Britain’s vulnerability to short-term losses of confidence in our economy. So there are clear reasons to fear a Brexit-induced financial crisis that would trigger another recession. It’s not surprising, then, that the City of London almost unanimously supports the Remain camp.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.

COVID-19: Are we truly free or merely enslaved to ourselves?

‘Through discipline comes freedom’. Over two thousand years ago Aristotle warned that freedom means more than just “doing as one likes”. Ancient Greek societies survived...

Airtight on Asbestos – A campaign to save our future

On the 24th of November 1999, the United Kingdom banned the use of asbestos. Twenty years later and this toxic mineral still plagues public health,...

Rationality & Regionality: A more effective way to dealing with climate change | by Hamza King

Liberalism relies heavily on certain assumptions about the human condition, particularly, about our ability to act rationally. John Rawls defines a rational person as one...

The Disraeli Room
What are the Implications of proroguing Parliament?

During his campaign, Boris Johnson made it very clear that when it comes to proroguing Parliament, he is “not going to take anything off the...

ResPublica’s submission to CMA

Download the full text of the submission On 3rd July 2019, the CMA launched a market study into online platforms and the digital advertising market...

The Disraeli Room
Productive Places | WSP and ResPublica

On Wednesday 31st October ResPublica and WSP hosted a panel discussion in Parliament to launch WSP’s Productive Places paper and debate its findings. The report...

ResPublica’s Response to the Autumn Budget 2018

The 2018 Budget delivered by Philip Hammond was the first since 1962 to be delivered on a day other than a Wednesday, and was moved...

ResPublica Response to changes to the National Planning Policy Framework

The Government’s housing announcements on the 5th March were the first substantial change to the planning system since the Coalition reforms six years ago. The...

Food poverty: Time to lift the veil?

A century on from Charles Booth’s famous Poverty Map of London, accurate information on poverty has never been more important. So the findings of...