The Disraeli Room

The Disraeli Room

Blog Post

We need a manufacturing resurgence more than ever. How can we bring it about?

28th June 2016

There’s been a familiar narrative emerging since Thursday’s vote – this was the left behind white working class getting one over the London-centric political and economic elites. I think that analysis only takes us so far as it glosses over diversity within the Leave vote. Indeed, what divided Remain and Leave voters was not class but “authoritarian” (or social conservative) and “libertarian” (or liberal) values. But a key reason that Leave won was that it got support from those people who felt alienated in both of these dichotomies – social conservatives who have been left behind in post-industrial areas. The key issue now is what policy-makers can do about this in the post-Brexit landscape.

Where manufacturing is most important to a regional economy, the Leave vote saw big increases – in the East, where goods exports are 20.8% of regional GDP, there was a 56.5% Leave vote; 28.4% of Wales’ GDP is from goods exports and it saw a surprise 52.5% vote. Perhaps the best example is Sunderland, whose main employer Nissan is a key exporter. Leave won by 22.6%.

Commentators have been quick to deride Leave voters in areas so economically reliant on exports to Europe. So why has this happened?

The problem is that manufacturing is central to regional economies, but is under threat from increased global competition. So the perception of UK manufacturing – a key source of stable, high wage employment – is that it is continually under threat. That gives those working in the sector a real sense of precariousness. See the collapse of the steel industry in Wales and the North East (Redcar voted by a massive 32.4% for Brexit).

More than ever, we need a manufacturing strategy that nationally ensures the terms of trade for manufacturing are a material consideration of economic policy-making, and locally on providing export support, building back supply chains and addressing chronic skills shortages. For too long, Britain has lagged behind our European competitors in this regard – France, Germany and Italy all have better national and local strategies for their manufacturing sectors. The result has been to undermine the regrowth of post-industrial towns and cities and to undermine security for those employed in the sector.


We shouldn’t exaggerate. UK advanced manufacturing is world-leading and highly successful. But employment in advanced manufacturing requires advanced skills that our skills framework isn’t delivering for people. That means the sector relies on EU migration to gain access to a skilled workforce, hence the importance of freedom of movement to our economy. Meanwhile, people in unskilled roles both within the sector and in the services activity it supports – such as transport and warehousing – face more competition from migration than those who have moved up the value chain.

Brexit will undoubtedly be a challenge for British manufacturing. But Britain still has a fantastic opportunity to ride the next wave of industrial automation and digitisation – what has been labelled Industry 4.0 – if we can get this right. We need to be thinking about how to maintain the success of our major manufacturers whilst helping smaller firms in supply chains to access the benefits of Industry 4.0. Crucially, we have to do more to ensure we boost digital skills so that more high value, secure, meaningful employment is available around the country.

2 comments on “We need a manufacturing resurgence more than ever. How can we bring it about?”

  1. Julie Lees says:

    Articulate and interesting article. You wouldn’t be interested in taking the Labour leadership, would you? I’d vote for you.

  2. Andy Forbes says:

    There’s increasing consensus that England’s engineering and manufacturing sector has been badly served by the English education system. Under successive governments over a period of decades schools have largely stopped doing any practical or applied subjects, while universities have concentrated more and more on degrees in theoretical science and high-end research. Funding incentives have ensured that apprenticeships and other vocational training has been predominantly offered in cheaper-to-deliver classroom based subjects, not in technical education. A manufacturing resurgence would have to be supported by a re-wired educational system, which will require radical curtailment of the universities’ freedom to hoover up an unlimited number of students into any degree subject, and far greater prioritisation of technical education, including at sub-degree level. Schools need tangible incentives to re-introduce technical subjects into the curriculum and to encourage school leavers into apprenticeships and this needs to be introduced across the country, not via piecemeal (and badly designed) initiatives like Sir Ken Baker’s University Technical Colleges. The Sainsbury recommendations for Technical Education need to be urgently implemented and properly funded. In order to reach the left-behind areas of post-industrial Britain which drove so much of the Brexit vote, the FE College sector needs to be revitalised and properly supported. FE Colleges are typically located right in the heart of post-industrial towns and cities and have long-standing links with local industry, including SMEs. They provide a stable ready-made platform from which to reach into local communities and deliver training which is directly linked to employment at all skill levels in manufacturing and engineering companies. With the right funding regime they also have the ability to reach adult as well as young students, and to upskill existing employees as well as train new entrants. a manufacturing resurgence will need a resurgence of technical education as a key component.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.

COVID-19: Are we truly free or merely enslaved to ourselves?

‘Through discipline comes freedom’. Over two thousand years ago Aristotle warned that freedom means more than just “doing as one likes”. Ancient Greek societies survived...

Airtight on Asbestos – A campaign to save our future

On the 24th of November 1999, the United Kingdom banned the use of asbestos. Twenty years later and this toxic mineral still plagues public health,...

Rationality & Regionality: A more effective way to dealing with climate change | by Hamza King

Liberalism relies heavily on certain assumptions about the human condition, particularly, about our ability to act rationally. John Rawls defines a rational person as one...

The Disraeli Room
What are the Implications of proroguing Parliament?

During his campaign, Boris Johnson made it very clear that when it comes to proroguing Parliament, he is “not going to take anything off the...

ResPublica’s submission to CMA

Download the full text of the submission On 3rd July 2019, the CMA launched a market study into online platforms and the digital advertising market...

The Disraeli Room
Productive Places | WSP and ResPublica

On Wednesday 31st October ResPublica and WSP hosted a panel discussion in Parliament to launch WSP’s Productive Places paper and debate its findings. The report...

ResPublica’s Response to the Autumn Budget 2018

The 2018 Budget delivered by Philip Hammond was the first since 1962 to be delivered on a day other than a Wednesday, and was moved...

ResPublica Response to changes to the National Planning Policy Framework

The Government’s housing announcements on the 5th March were the first substantial change to the planning system since the Coalition reforms six years ago. The...

Food poverty: Time to lift the veil?

A century on from Charles Booth’s famous Poverty Map of London, accurate information on poverty has never been more important. So the findings of...