The Disraeli Room

The Disraeli Room

Blog Post

Bitcoin is not anonymous

24th March 2015

Bitcoin is far more transparent than the cash and bank accounts we use today, says Tom Robinson, co-founder of Elliptic

The public image of bitcoin, cultivated by the media, is of the international criminal’s currency of choice – an anonymous, untraceable means of laundering proceeds of crime. This has made for compelling column inches, but the opposite is true. Bitcoin is in fact the most transparent payment method ever developed, and has the potential to become a powerful tool in the fight against financial crime.

On day nine of the trial of Ross Ulbricht, the prosecution called their key witness: Ilhwan Yum, an FBI special agent and cyber security expert. Ulbricht had been arrested in a San Francisco public library fifteen months earlier, and charged with being the owner and operator of Silk Road, the world’s largest online illegal marketplace. By using bitcoin as the only means of payment, the operators of the site hoped to maintain the anonymity of their users, who were primarily engaged in buying and selling illegal drugs. Over $1 billion in transactions took place on Silk Road between February 2011 and July 2013, and almost $80m of commissions were earned by the operators – all in bitcoins.

FBI Agent Yum’s testimony provided a clear and high-profile illustration of what those with a technical understanding of the digital currency already knew – that bitcoin transactions are anything but anonymous. Up until this point in the trial, Ulbricht’s defence team had maintained that he was not the operator of the Silk Road, and had merely created it before handing it over to others. Yum provided the smoking gun in the form of incontrovertible proof that over a 12-month period, more than 700,000 bitcoins had been transferred from the Silk Road bitcoin wallet directly to a wallet on Ross Ulbricht’s laptop.

To understand how this link could be made, we need to take a closer look at how bitcoin transactions work. In order to send or receive bitcoins, you need a bitcoin address – a string of letters and numbers. This address is analogous to an email address: you can send bitcoins to a bitcoin address in the same way as you can send emails to an email address. At the core of bitcoin is a public, online ledger recording every single transaction, for all to see, known as the blockchain. Agent Yum simply searched the bitcoin blockchain for transactions involving the bitcoin addresses found in the Silk Road wallet and those on Ross Ulbricht’s laptop – and bingo, he found direct transactions between them.

Now of course the blockchain does not record everything – Identities of the transacting parties are not recorded. So bitcoin is pseudonymous rather than anonymous – your pseudonym (bitcoin address) is recorded, but your identity isn’t. However in many cases identities can be linked to bitcoin addresses, and it is usually much easier than seizing someone’s laptop.

Any bitcoin transaction with a party that knows your identity leaks information that can be used to identify your activity, past and future, on the block chain.For example, if you transfer bitcoins to an online retailer, an exchange, or many of the other services that take customer identity information, you allow them to link that identity to your block chain pseudonym, potentially revealing the other transactions that you are party to.

Bitcoin therefore provides the ultimate paper trail for law enforcement agencies, tax authorities and compliance professionals. This traceability also makes bitcoin theft a far less attractive endeavour. Many tens of millions of pounds’ worth of bitcoins have been stolen from exchanges and wallet services over the past few years, but the thieves have been able to do very little with these stolen funds, because in most cases they have been identified on the block chain and forever “tainted” – the digital equivalent of blood-stained fifty pound notes.

Of course, bitcoin laundering tools, known as ‘mixers’ or ‘tumblers’, have sprung up. These services attempt to break up the paper trail by exchanging one set of bitcoins for another with different addresses and transaction histories. However these services have serious limitations – they tend not to work well for large volumes and the laundering process can itself often be identified on the blockchain.

We are only just starting to scratch the surface of what information can be mined from the open transaction ledger at the heart of bitcoin. As criminals develop more sophisticated laundering techniques, so others will develop more powerful tools to extract identifying information from the block chain and trace payments.

This also has serious implications for user privacy – we are on the whole comfortable with entrusting our financial information with banks, but opening up this transaction history for all to see on the blockchain may be too much for many. The laundering techniques employed by criminals may be indistinguishable from completely justified efforts by bitcoin users to mask their activity – but we must protect the right to maintain this privacy.

What is clear is that regulators and law enforcement agencies should not fear this technology, but embrace it. The transparency of digital currencies makes them an uncomfortable home for proceeds of crime.


Elliptic is a London-based digital asset custodian and provider of blockchain-based compliance services.

To find out more about the UK Digital Currency Association (UKDCA), please visit their website. Follow them on Twitter @UK_DCA.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.

COVID-19: Are we truly free or merely enslaved to ourselves?

‘Through discipline comes freedom’. Over two thousand years ago Aristotle warned that freedom means more than just “doing as one likes”. Ancient Greek societies survived...

Airtight on Asbestos – A campaign to save our future

On the 24th of November 1999, the United Kingdom banned the use of asbestos. Twenty years later and this toxic mineral still plagues public health,...

Rationality & Regionality: A more effective way to dealing with climate change | by Hamza King

Liberalism relies heavily on certain assumptions about the human condition, particularly, about our ability to act rationally. John Rawls defines a rational person as one...

The Disraeli Room
What are the Implications of proroguing Parliament?

During his campaign, Boris Johnson made it very clear that when it comes to proroguing Parliament, he is “not going to take anything off the...

ResPublica’s submission to CMA

Download the full text of the submission On 3rd July 2019, the CMA launched a market study into online platforms and the digital advertising market...

The Disraeli Room
Productive Places | WSP and ResPublica

On Wednesday 31st October ResPublica and WSP hosted a panel discussion in Parliament to launch WSP’s Productive Places paper and debate its findings. The report...

ResPublica’s Response to the Autumn Budget 2018

The 2018 Budget delivered by Philip Hammond was the first since 1962 to be delivered on a day other than a Wednesday, and was moved...

ResPublica Response to changes to the National Planning Policy Framework

The Government’s housing announcements on the 5th March were the first substantial change to the planning system since the Coalition reforms six years ago. The...

Food poverty: Time to lift the veil?

A century on from Charles Booth’s famous Poverty Map of London, accurate information on poverty has never been more important. So the findings of...