The Disraeli Room

The Disraeli Room

Blog Post

The Future of Scotland: Enhanced devolution is the right path for Scotland

12th March 2014

Peter Duncan, Managing Director of Message Matters, makes the case for Devo Plus

As we move into the last 200 days before Scotland’s big decision is taken on 18th September, something has happened to the debate in Scotland. Suddenly the volume has been turned up, and uncertainty about the likely result has increased. Everyone, other than rose-tinted bespectacled unionists, knew that the polls would narrow (and they have), and everyone knew that the New Year would see a significant boost to the profiles of the individual campaigns. Yet few could have predicted the heightened sense of doubt that now permeates civic society and business planning north of the border.

Of course, many of the old fundamentals remain true. There is no settled majority which backs a split from the rest of the UK. However, what is now clear is that this fact may, in itself, not be enough to ensure a win for Better Together in September. Polls regularly put the percentage of Scots planning to vote “Yes” at over 40%, amongst those who have made up their minds, and suddenly the prospect of a nationalist summer surge founded on Saltires flying at the Commonwealth Games and any increased prospect of a Conservative general election victory (and the resulting opportunity to spread panic amongst Labour voters) does not sound so fanciful.

So, why is the momentum swinging so clearly towards the Yes campaign – what is it that has given them the turbo boost of self-confidence that has been apparent since January?

Fundamentally, it’s because the case for Scotland remaining part of the UK has remained unchanged despite the changing desires of the Scottish people. There is a core demand from Scots that is not being responded to by the unionist parties making up the Better Together campaign. Almost every snapshot of public opinion makes it clear that the most popular outcome, with greater support than independence or the status quo, is enhanced devolution within the UK. Put simply, the public of Scotland want to remain part of the UK, but they recognise that devolution to date has been piecemeal and unsatisfactory.

Ever since the 1970s, and arguably long before, there has been a sense that Scotland needed the ability to take its own decisions, and after the referendum in 1997 a substantial settlement was delivered and the Scottish Parliament re-formed. New powers over spending were devolved, including in key areas such as health, education and transport, yet with minimal say over raising the money that was spent, a major accountability deficit was created. Relative tinkering around the edges in recent years has moved us to the position that the Scottish Parliament will soon have boosted tax powers, but still only amounting to Scotland raising 15% of what it spends. Broadly, Holyrood spends over £30bn, but still has only marginal responsibility for raising it.

Devo Plus is the proposal put forward by Reform Scotland, which has the potential to make a significant difference to the devolved landscape and deliver a situation which is not only the most popular solution for most Scots, but also the best and sustainable solution. It would see Scotland responsible for raising all of income tax and corporation tax, amongst others, whilst Westminster retained responsibility for collecting VAT and national insurance. A more balanced situation would emerge where the Scottish Parliament had responsibility for raising over half what it spent in Scotland.

All the unionist parties have been “talking the talk” on devolution of powers, but time is now running out for them to “walk the walk” before Referendum Day. To truly maximise the chances of a resounding “no” vote, a genuine cross party agreement was required on what “no” meant for the future governance in Scotland. Instead of which, a piecemeal approach is continuing, some hints here, nods and winks there, but no fundamental agreement on future steps.

That lack of clarity is bound to have an impact on polling day. In the last weeks and days, Alex Salmond will, correctly, point out that no consensus exists on what will happen after a “no” vote, and will argue that the likely outcome will be the status quo. Whilst no-one truly believes that the post-Scotland Act status quo will last, he will be right in pointing out that no joint commitments have been made. He will hope for a late surge similar to the 2011 election.

I have always believed that a substantial new devolution offer, like Devo Plus, would open up the possibility of a “yes” vote below 30%, perhaps as low as 25%, and the potential for the SNP to survive that kind of result would be questionable. As time moves on there is a danger that any new co-ordinated offer will be reactive and will be portrayed as unionists being panicked into a response to rising support for the “yes” case.

That being said, enhanced devolution remains popular and it remains the right path for Scotland. It will deliver better government in Scotland and in the rest of the UK. Devo Plus remains the only credible, costed and deliverable option on the table for a more devolved Scotland, and it has support across the political spectrum.

What is required now is the political leadership that has been lacking to force a game changing offer onto the table, even at this late stage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.

COVID-19: Are we truly free or merely enslaved to ourselves?

‘Through discipline comes freedom’. Over two thousand years ago Aristotle warned that freedom means more than just “doing as one likes”. Ancient Greek societies survived...

Airtight on Asbestos – A campaign to save our future

On the 24th of November 1999, the United Kingdom banned the use of asbestos. Twenty years later and this toxic mineral still plagues public health,...

Rationality & Regionality: A more effective way to dealing with climate change | by Hamza King

Liberalism relies heavily on certain assumptions about the human condition, particularly, about our ability to act rationally. John Rawls defines a rational person as one...

The Disraeli Room
What are the Implications of proroguing Parliament?

During his campaign, Boris Johnson made it very clear that when it comes to proroguing Parliament, he is “not going to take anything off the...

ResPublica’s submission to CMA

Download the full text of the submission On 3rd July 2019, the CMA launched a market study into online platforms and the digital advertising market...

The Disraeli Room
Productive Places | WSP and ResPublica

On Wednesday 31st October ResPublica and WSP hosted a panel discussion in Parliament to launch WSP’s Productive Places paper and debate its findings. The report...

ResPublica’s Response to the Autumn Budget 2018

The 2018 Budget delivered by Philip Hammond was the first since 1962 to be delivered on a day other than a Wednesday, and was moved...

ResPublica Response to changes to the National Planning Policy Framework

The Government’s housing announcements on the 5th March were the first substantial change to the planning system since the Coalition reforms six years ago. The...

Food poverty: Time to lift the veil?

A century on from Charles Booth’s famous Poverty Map of London, accurate information on poverty has never been more important. So the findings of...