Launched on November 30th, Beyond Belief: Defending religious liberty through the British Bill of Rights reflects on the thesis that in a free and plural society, rights should protect difference and ensure equity between those of different dispositions. A curious legal and philosophical inversion seems to have taken place over recent decade; where once rights were used to ensure diversity, now they are often utilised to erode difference and enforce a uniform conformity on society. This trend is particularly true with the right to religious liberty and the treatment of religious groups.
Since its enactment, equality legislation has enabled the courts to exercise complete control over who is free to discriminate against whom, and to regulate the inner moral convictions of private citizens. While this legislation has affected society in various ways, it is its effect on religious liberty that is particularly pernicious. This is not a niche concern. Indeed, assaults on the liberty and dignity of certain groups should worry us all. Evidence demonstrates that societies that vigorously protect religious freedom enjoy a wide range of other fundamental rights as well, in particular freedom of speech and freedom of association. Religious freedom remains one of the most effective limits on the intrusion by the state on individual and communal life.
Beyond Belief argues that in a climate of fear and distrust of religion, more needs to be done to protect the freedoms of people of faith, and the best way to do this is to press ahead with a British Bill of Rights and include the freedom to express religious belief within it. It is vital that the Government urgently introduces legislation that supports and protects religious beliefs and practices, and the new British Bill of Rights offers a rare opportunity to achieve this goal. ResPublica believes that it should be used to introduce a principle of ‘reasonable accommodation’ into the law. This would better balance the deep-held religious beliefs of certain elements of society with other interest groups, and ensure that all religions and belief systems can feel respected and protected in the eyes of the law.
David Burrowes MP, Conservative MP and Founder of the Conservative Christian Fellowship, said: “Religious liberty is a fundamental right, but recently we have seen it being downgraded compared to other human rights. I am delighted that the ‘Religious Liberty & Literacy Report’ is shedding light on this pressing, but too often overlooked issue. Religious freedom is a universal human right which is foundational to a good society, and should not shunned or marginalised.
“This ResPublica report delivers a strong set of recommendations for Government in light of the future British Bill of Rights, which would be the perfect vehicle for underlining the UK’s commitment to reasonable accommodation of religious belief. I encourage the Government to consider these recommendations carefully.”
Director of ResPublica, Phillip Blond, said: “By refusing people the right to wear a cross or headscarf at work we are eroding the good that could be achieved.
“We hear a lot about the bad things people do in the name of religion but all faiths actually have a role to play in bringing communities together and stopping division.
“Those who go to church, temple or mosque are far more likely to act in the public good whether it is helping deliver meals on wheels or running toddler clubs, or simply being part of a group of like-minded people.”
Nola Leach, Chief Executive of Care (Christian Action Research & Education), said: “Religious freedom can be seen as a luxury – but it is an essential human right that must be protected. This report highlights some concerning trends which show how faith is becoming sidelined in the public square and could lead to a greater privatisation of religious beliefs.
“We need to be aware that these trends will lead to questions about how people of faith can contribute and engage in all aspects of society. This report highlights the vital role that people of faith already play in our communities; we must not put ourselves in a position where we disregard and neglect the role these groups play in our society – for example religious groups are often in a position where they can distribute welfare must more effective than local government can.
“As the Government considers the British Bill of Rights, we hope this report will help them to consider the many issues facing people of faith as they seek to participate fully in society.
“We must allow for reasonable accommodation for religious belief in UK law so that policymakers and judges can balance the rights and freedoms that different groups and individuals are entitled to in the UK most effectively.
“With the tension and division of the Brexit campaign and result still raw this report offers a timely reminder of the need to allow for difference of opinion and free expression of belief.”
In partnership with
Published: 30 November 2016
Key recommendations of the report include:
Incorporate a duty of reasonable accommodation in the Bill of Rights: Employers should no longer compel individuals to behave in ways that would contradict their sincerely held religious beliefs. We believe that the proposed Bill of Rights provides a unique opportunity to include a duty on employers and service providers to demonstrate reasonable accommodation towards those that wish to express their religious convictions in public.
Commit to introducing a Bill of Rights in the Queen’s Speech to swiftly introduce reasonable accommodation: In the backdrop of Brexit negotiations, it is easy to see how the Government’s commitment to a British Bill of Rights may be sidelined and delayed indefinitely. For this reason, we ask that Government commit to introducing the Bill of Rights at the earliest possible opportunity, which is probably the Queen’s Speech in early 2017.
Ensure the EHRC introduces a Religious Freedom Code of Practice:Integrating a duty of reasonable accommodation into a legislative framework for protecting freedom of religion will not be possible if it is not also practicable. To that end, a Religious Freedom Code of Practice should be devised by the Equality and Human Rights Commission to help employers and service-providers resolve tensions between religious belief and other protected characteristics.
Establish a Religious Policy Review Council in central government: Given the widespread and well-documented levels of religious illiteracy amongst policy-makers, it is hardly surprising that religious freedom is now considered to be an ‘orphaned’ right. A practical means of combatting this would be create a Religious Policy Review Council in central government, which would advise on the implications of certain policies on religious communities.
Enforce existing statutory duties on universities on freedom of speech: Parliament has imposed unambiguous statutory obligations on colleges and universities to secure freedom of speech for their members, students, employees, and visiting speakers. The various ‘safe space’ initiatives that are operational across university campuses highlight that these provisions are not being honoured. Addressing such breaches would send a signal to institutions that the Government is committed to the view that freedom of religion.
Create a Religious Freedom Index to monitor infringements of religious liberty: There is an increasing danger that policy-makers overlook subtler encroachments on the rights of religious citizens. For this reason, the Office for National Statistics at the UK level, and the Council of Europe at the international level, should establish indices that would measure failures by businesses and public-sector bodies to make reasonable accommodation for the religious beliefs of citizens.
Dr James Orr is McDonald Postdoctoral Fellow in Theology, Ethics, and Public Life at Christ Church, University of Oxford.
Dr Orr’s research spans topics and thinkers on both the continental and analytic traditions of philosophical theology and theological ethics. His...
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.