Subscribe to our mailing list to receive regular email updates of ResPublica's work, upcoming events and recent blogs from the Disraeli Room.
The second Budget of 2017 delivered by Philip Hammond following the abolition of the Autumn Statement, was widely trailed as a tight political tightrope for the Chancellor due to worsening growth forecasts and tensions within The Cabinet. Below is our overall response from Director Phillip Blond in addition to analysis on what this Budget means for our key policy interests.
Phillip Blond, Director of ResPublica, said:
“Incremental underwhelming interventionism is probably the phrase I would use to describe the Budget.
The big retail takeaway will no doubt be the stamp duty cut – it does however raise house prices and benefit the already owning more than those who wish to own. But the increase in price will be more easily financed than any lump sum requirement so that probably works for buyers.
In terms of wholesale takeaways – the shocking regression in our growth figures – with a cumulative hit to the UK’s economy of 3% by 2020, bodes ill for public services. They will need a longer bus to chart the costs of Brexit if this continues.
If this was a housing budget then the single best idea is lifting the cap on borrowing from housing revenue accounts for councils in high demand areas. It’s not clear that the rest of the package will deliver anything like the new numbers of houses pledged or needed. That said there remains some £8 billion pledged for housing guarantee schemes that could if properly applied make a real difference.
In addition to this there was much welcome investment in rebalancing the country with devolution and infrastructure investment. As well as a recognition of the tech future now upon us and a wish to invest in it.
If you have a good idea The Treasury are listening and that can only be good, but we simply lack the financial scale to invest in the proportions needed and looking at the growth forecasts it will only get worse.”
The headline on economic performance is that growth has been revised down by the OBR, to a lacklustre 1.3% by 2019. Productivity has and will continue to fall despite increased investment in R&D and Skills. The chancellor announced a basket of incremental measures to boost growth, including:
Mark Morrin, Principal Research Consultant said: “There was nothing in The Budget that resembled an overall plan or explained how disparities in regional economies will be addressed, short of general commitments to further devolution and a modest Transforming Cities Fund. The government’s own analysis points to the place-based solution; if the UK increased the productivity of the five biggest city regions outside of London to match the UK average that could increase GDP by £31 billion a year. We can expect more flesh on the bones when the Government’s flagship industrial strategy is launched on Monday but it was largely absent in today’s budget.”
This budget widened the offer geographically on devolution, with a city deal for Belfast, a growth deal for North Wales, as well as further Scottish city deals in Stirling and on the Tay.
Notable for its absence was the previous promise for additional 1-2% business rate levy for Combined Authorities to pay for new infrastructure, which was promised previously. This had been delayed by the cancellation of the local government finance bill. In it’s place were two measures:
Combined Authorities were could be offered a new Strategic Infrastructure Tariff (SIT) on new developments, much as London used to fund Crossrail.
Local authorities will be able to access £1bn of discounted lending, accessible for three years.
However, these measures are not total replacements for the revenue that the infrastructure levy would have provided. The SIT will only be available from new developments. Lending must, of course, be paid back. Therefore these measures are not ideal for councils looking to invest in a long term, ongoing improvement in transport.
The most significant deepening of devolution was reserved for areas that had adopted an elected Metro-mayor. The Chancellor allocated them:
Half of the £1.7bn Transforming Cities Fund
£12m Capacity funding per year, to boost their central teams
A number of local infrastructure projects were also funded, with £250m to pay for a new tram line in the West Midlands, and £98m for a new bridge in Great Yarmouth. This demonstrated the advantage to authorities that had worked up infrastructure schemes that although unfunded, were “shovel-ready”.
Tom Follett, Policy & Projects Manager, said: “The budget saw a widening of the geographic offer on devolution, but the most radical measures are restricted to areas with Metro-mayors. New borrowing and developer contributions are welcome, but don’t make up for the absence of the previously planned infrastructure levy on business rates”.
The housing market needs different interventions to resolve different problems. The Chancellor’s broad range of measures is therefore welcome.
The focus on making both existing and new cities dense and therefore and sustainable. The Chancellor’s proposal to “expect local authorities to grant permission for development of land outside their existing plan if the homes are offered at a discount for sale or rent” is therefore concerning. For a small discount, developers could build unsustainable houses far from transport links.
By far the largest sum committed is £8bn for new financial guarantees for private sector house building. No detail has been provided, but it is hoped this will deployed along the lines of ResPublica’s National Housing Fund. Our proposal is much larger, at £100bn over ten years, and builds houses to rent, with money returned to the Government.
The issue of land was not mentioned, but is a major barrier. Land is very expensive as landowners retain the gains in land value that come with planning permission. Reforms to Compulsory Purchase Orders to enable councils to buy land at fair market value are needed to enable this, but there was no mention.
Phillip Blond, Director of ResPublica, said “The measures proposed are incremental rather than revolutionary. ResPublica has proposed a borrow-to-build National Housing Fund, where the government borrows through a shared partnership with Housing associations which build homes for rent. This isn’t specifically mentioned, although it is not clear how the £8bn allocated to ‘new financial guarantees’ to support purpose-built housebuilding will work. We urge the Government to deploy the £8bn along the lines of our proposal for a National Housing Fund to build the homes we need.”
The Chancellor emphasized his commitment to ensuring free NHS access for all at the first point of need. He has set aside £6.3 billion for frontline NHS services as well as upgrades to buildings and facilities. In addition to the Government’s endorsement of the NHS’s Five Year Forward View, Mr. Hammond will allocate £2.8 billion of resource funding to NHS England over 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2019-20 for day to day spending. Of this, £350 million is earmarked for handling winter stresses this year. The Chancellor hopes this action will enable the NHS to meet the A&E four-hour target throughout next year, improve waiting time targets and reduce waiting lists.
Researcher Anna Hazelwood, said: “ResPublica welcomes this cash injection, at a time when the NHS is tackling the dual challenges of increased demand and reduced resources. Indeed, Mr. Hammond himself acknowledged the problems posed by an aging population and continued technological advancement. However, the £2.8 billion figure falls short the £4 billion per year called for by Simon Stevens, Chief Executive of NHS England. Mr. Stevens argued that this was essential for the organization to maintain standards of care and meet the rising demand for health services.
Ultimately Britain is facing a health crisis of social and economic consequence. In this context, radical solutions are essential to secure the health of the population. Instead, the Budget outlines incremental changes. Indeed, Mr. Hammond’s failure to mention social care is indicative of this lack of innovation. Looking forward, one solution may be to relieve GPs by unlocking the skill and potential of Community Pharmacy, as proposed in our recent report Heartbeats on the High Street.”
The Chancellors announced a variety of investment in education and skills:
Researcher Henna Shah said: “The policy of ‘more maths for everyone’ speaks to the demands of a changing world but whilst it is important for students and schools to be incentivised to improve performance, this should not come at the detriment of ensuring that all students are catered for – we do not want a perversion of incentives that pushes students towards options that are not right for them. We thus eagerly anticipate the support that will be provided for the introduction of T levels – these must be properly supported to ensure that every student receives the high quality training that is right for them.
The creation of institutions such as a National Centre for Computing to share best practice is vital to allow teachers to continue to learn and achieve the best outcomes. However, the Government has not gone far enough. If the investment in CPD and the National Centre proves successful, we should see this scheme expanded to ensure no teacher, and no child, is left behind.”
November 8, 2018
The Government’s housing announcements on the 5th March were the first substantial change to the planning system since the Coalition reforms six years ago. The...
March 20, 2018
By Sara Gariban
Following the creation of the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy in July 2016 and firing the starting gun for a string of sector...
November 28, 2017
The second Budget of 2017 delivered by Philip Hammond following the abolition of the Autumn Statement, was widely trailed as a tight political tightrope for...
November 22, 2017
FOBTs or B2 machines are highly addictive, one way we know this, according to research conducted by the Campaign for Fairer Gambling, is that FOBT...
May 15, 2017
London, SW1A 2DD
020 3857 8310
For media enquiries, please email:
The ResPublica Trust is a company limited by guarantee registered in England and Wales, number 07081565, registered office Finchley House, 707 High Road, London N12 0BT.