Filter By

The Big Society already exists, we just need to enable people to reach it

A guest blog by Paul Twivy, CEO of The Big Society Network

Our societal issues are more complex but also more resolvable than is usually portrayed. Consider this paradox.

On the one hand, we have record levels of social isolation amongst old and young alike with 7 million people living on their own in England and Wales alone. 97% of neighbourhoods have become more fragmented since 1971. Average life expectancy varies between the richest and the poorest by 14 years and the richest 10% of the population are 100 times as wealthy as the poorest 10%.

Our general level of social trust has almost halved since the late 1950's despite the fact that so much else has improved. 61% of us don't feel able to affect local decisions. Only 1 in 33 of us attend public meetings. Only a quarter of us take part in any kind of regular, formal volunteering.
Yet many of us as disempowered, angry and disenchanted citizens, sit with a “Berlin Wall” in front of us.

On the other side of this “Berlin Wall” are an estimated 900,000 to 1 million community groups, 1 for every 6 citizens; 238,000 social entrepreneurs, many of them brave, persistent, 1-10 person charities born out of anger and passion, fighting the toughest problems on our doorsteps, only 1% of whom get any kind of formal funding. Imagine if we made it even 3%.

We need to smash down this Berlin Wall so that all of us can firstly see the extraordinary diversity and energy of civic society, of social enterprise and community groups.

We then need to create a brilliant filtering and guiding mechanism by which people can find or create the right groups and enterprises for them, in their local areas, using the starting-point of their own needs, issues, talents and passions.

We need to make The Big Society practical and within reach.

We need to bring people with us in small steps that get larger and more confident with time.

Maslow famously developed a Hierarchy of Needs. I would like to introduce a similar principle in relation to Citizens: the Ladder of Citizenship.

A small number of people go from being unengaged citizens to tackling an overt problem by setting up an organisation. Thank God they do. For most people, they will start with something much more modest. They might help a neighbour for the first time. They might help organise or take part in a Big Lunch as a million people did this July. They might use their mobile or a public kiosk to spontaneously register a problem, a saving, an idea and send it to their local authority. They might join a hobby-based group like Stitch n' Bitch or a football club. From there they might then decide, with that group of neighbours or hobbyists, to save the local post office or start a group for elderly people in a building lent by the local council.

One activity, one baby step gets people to cross the line from unengaged to engaged.

It is best that we never mention The Big Society but that millions of people cross that line millions of times. Then in three years we will turn round and find ourselves in The Big Society rather than just talking about it.

Paul Twivy is CEO of The Big Society Network, who celebrated the Big Society and its key players at the ‘The Big Society Party' with ResPublica and Business in the Community at Conservative conference.

Comments on: The Big Society already exists, we just need to enable people to reach it

Gravatar Alan Rogers 26 October 2010
It is a small project but I think it sheds light on the practical problems of the Big Society idea.r/>For two years I have been trying to persuade everyone I can get to listen that, in Wales, hospital chaplaincy should, like the Air Ambulance Service, be funded by a charitable trust. This trust can only be created by the “faith communities” and will only be created if the Assembly Government declares it to be required.r/>The reactions have been revealing.r/>The Church in Wales, by this I mean the Archbishop and all the Bishops, say the amount involved (£1.37 million per annum) is “small fry” and the NHS has accepted responsibility for religious care in hospitals so the C in W has no need to act. r/>The minister Edwina Hart says she thinks the service is “best” funded from the NHS budget. This is just an opinion and she offers no supporting evidence or any analysis of “best” for whom. A simple stakeholder analysis refutes her opinion.r/>Why is the minister so adamant? Does she fear offending the “faith communities”? Does she fear offending UNITE the union? The impressively named College of Health Care Chaplains is a professional branch of UNITE.r/>Why is the C in W so reluctant? Does it not have faith in the charitable qualities of adherents? r/>There will be no transfer of financial responsibility from the state to the “faith communities” while these attitudes persist. r/>Alan Rogersr/>r/>
Reply
Gravatar Hugh Barnard 07 October 2010
ode>r/>They might use their mobile or a public kiosk to spontaneously register a problem, a saving, an idea and send it to their local authority. r/>r/>r/>In that case they'd probably be wasting their time wouldn't they? The problem is not us (and I say this as a community activist) it is 'you', national and local government, national and local civil service, 'funded' and patronising large charities, commentators and bloggers, false 'social enterprises' and all the other make-believe and hogwash washing in with the money.r/>r/>It's a matter of deep irony that this commentary appears under the heading of 'The Disraeli Room'.
Reply

Join the discussion Have opinions on this matter? Why not get involved and comment on this below.

Become a Member Joining ResPublica give you an exclusive amount of features. Gain early access to ResPublica events, contribute to topics and much more.

Detailed Summary

Date Published
05 October 2010

Categories
Big Society
civic participation
Welfare and Public Services

About The Authors

Paul Twivy

Paul Twivy is CEO of The Big Society Network, who celebrated the Big Society and its key players at the ‘The Big Soc...