Filter By

Response to PASC Report on the Big Society

House Magazine

We warmly welcome the publication of the PASC report. Its single most important recommendation is perhaps its biggest: that there should be a single Big Society Minister with a cross-cutting brief to drive through the agenda. The failure to give the Big Society an across the board brief with ministerial backing will mean that it will succeed in some places and fail in others. The step change needed requires a leading figure to personify and drive through the necessary reforms.
 
The second most important recognition of the report is the need to open up public services to alternative providers. We are delighted that the Committee recognises that the contracting out model has tended to favour the larger, more commercial models. The Big Society cannot prosper without the ‘little society’ – a diversity of groups need to be engaged, and not just, in the words of the Committee, “the ‘Tesco’ charities that are skilled at tendering.” Real, ‘bottom-up’ enterprise
should be encouraged and stimulated, not state-driven initiatives that utilises the same, ‘safe’ providers.
 
There are a number of other important recommendations set out by the report, including the need to further encourage mutualisation in public services. But central to all of the above, as the report quite rightly highlights, is to have a vision of what the success of the Big Society project will actually look like – if it succeeds what will change and how.
 
The Committee recognises the dangers in simply commissioning the cheapest provider, and the dilemma that faces many commissioners as to whether to take on the additional costs of a small local charity or voluntary service. We think that many of the concerns raised by the PASC report can begin to be met by Chris White’s Public Services (Social Value) Bill, currently in the Lords which
legislates that public bodies have to consider ‘social when commissioning public services.
 
There is also a further opportunity for groups can ‘capture’ the state. The civil service has the opportunity to become a ‘civic service’ – a localised body of individuals who can enable the Big Society to happen by allowing themselves like local budgets in the localism bill to be taken over by citizens groups. Rather than simply encouraging civil servants to volunteer as a subsidiary to their role, as suggested by last year’s Giving White Paper, engagement with local civic solutions should become part of the very essence of their role – creating civil servants who are truly ‘civil’.
 
Linking the Big Society up with small businesses and the wider population will also be key to driving an overarching and engaging agenda. The agenda still largely relies on a failed volunteer narrative, so will struggle to go to scale. Big society is developing the policy architecture but not the popular content for its successful realisation – there is still much work to do.
 
ResPublica is hosting a public panel discussion in response to the PASC report on the Big Society, The Big Society: From policy to practice, which will take place this coming Thursday 12th from 6pm until 7:30pm. Please check www.respublica.org.uk/events/upcoming for further details and tickets.
 
Speakers include Bernard Jenkin MP, Chair of the Public Administration Select Committee; Danny Kruger, Chief Executive, Only Connect; Allison Ogden-Newton, Chief Executive, Social Enterprise London; and Phillip Blond, Director of ResPublica.

 

 

 

 


Comments on: Response to PASC Report on the Big Society

Join the discussion Have opinions on this matter? Why not get involved and comment on this below.

Become a Member Joining ResPublica give you an exclusive amount of features. Gain early access to ResPublica events, contribute to topics and much more.

Detailed Summary

Date Published
12 January 2012

Issue(s)
Models and Partnerships for Social Prosperity

About The Authors

Phillip Blond

Phillip is an internationally recognised political thinker and social and economic commentator. He founded ResPublica in...