Filter By

Philosophising the Big Society

Remarks from Chesterton on civic renewal

I have been looking for philosophical works that best capture the 'Big Society' concept. There are, of course, the Bs: Burke, Belloc and Blond. But a really neat insight into the concept, from where it comes, and why it is important, I have found in the work of G.K. Chesterton, and his opus, Orthodoxy. (Note, the sketch above is by Chesterton too). Here is the bit that got me:

***

'Let us suppose we are confronted with a desperate thing — say Pimlico. If we think what is really best for Pimlico we shall find the thread of thought leads to the throne or the mystic and the arbitrary. It is not enough for a man to disapprove of Pimlico: in that case he will merely cut his throat or move to Chelsea. Nor, certainly, is it enough for a man to approve of Pimlico: for then it will remain Pimlico, which would be awful.

‘The only way out of it seems to be for somebody to love Pimlico: to love it with a transcendental tie and without any earthly reason. If there arose a man who loved Pimlico, then Pimlico would rise into ivory towers and golden pinnacles; Pimlico would attire herself as a woman does when she is loved. For decoration is not given to hide horrible things: but to decorate things already adorable. A mother does not give her child a blue bow because he is so ugly without it. A lover does not give a girl a necklace to hide her neck.

‘If men loved Pimlico as mothers love children, arbitrarily, because it is theirs, Pimlico in a year or two might be fairer than Florence. Some readers will say that this is a mere fantasy. I answer that this is the actual history of mankind. This, as a fact, is how cities did grow great. Go back to the darkest roots of civilization and you will find them knotted round some sacred stone or encircling some sacred well. People first paid honour to a spot and afterwards gained glory for it. Men did not love Rome because she was great. She was great because they had loved her.'

***

Apropos: The Big Society Network's 'Your Square Mile' campaign to encourage activists to improve the square mile in which they live (and love?) can be found here

Have a very happy Easter.

Comments on: Philosophising the Big Society

Gravatar Pravin Jeyaraj 21 May 2010
Yes, when one is philosophising, one needs good garden furniture (see above comment). :)
Reply
Gravatar Garden Table Link Swap 20 May 2010
Hi there, I could not find any way to email you, and so I really hope that you read this comment. I own a website about garden tables, and thought you would like to exchange links with me. I have entered my contact address in case you would like to get in contact. Thank you.
Reply
Gravatar Pravin Jeyaraj 14 May 2010
Hi ashreem, I have just seen your reply. I can provide a more fuller response but, in a nutshell, the basis on Hegel's philosophy is that universal ideas find their realisation in the particular (lives, communities, institutions, etc). Change is effective when the universal idea is internalised within the particular and not imposed from above. In other words, change should be gradual, conservative, rather than radical. But at the same time, there is an underlying force, that Hegel calls spirit or mind, that directs the progress of history. In other words, change happens as fast or as slow as the spirit moves, it cannot be forced to speed up or slow down. Whilst Hegel was supporting of liberal ideals and philosophy and particularly the French Revolution, he saw it as a consequence of the French authorities irrational resistence to change. Liberal philosophy had to then be imposed, so the development of Franch from monarchy to republic was painful. In the Philosophy of History and On the English Reform Bill, he praised the the development of liberal philosophy in England and how it grew out of England's existence as a trading nation - basically, liberalism and social responsibility was recognised as an important in the course of doing business.
Reply
Gravatar Pravin Jeyaraj 02 April 2010
Can I suggest that one also adds Hegel to the list? Admittedly, he is not the easiest philosopher to read and does require a lot of patience and perseverance. A good place to start is 1831 essay "On the English Reform Bill".
Reply
Gravatar asheem.singh 02 April 2010
Thanks Pravin - an interesting choice. I would be very interested to read your perspective on why Hegel might be particularly apposite.
Reply
Gravatar Trafalmadore 02 April 2010
... and a happy easter to you too Asheem!
Reply
Gravatar Trafalmadore 02 April 2010
Belloc and Burke and Blond

Has a nice ring to it
Reply
Gravatar Penny 01 April 2010
Belterton?
Reply
Gravatar Ivan Denisovich 01 April 2010
Ah the great Chesterloc...
Reply

Join the discussion Have opinions on this matter? Why not get involved and comment on this below.

Become a Member Joining ResPublica give you an exclusive amount of features. Gain early access to ResPublica events, contribute to topics and much more.

Detailed Summary

Date Published
01 April 2010

Categories
Big Society
chesterton
Philosophy

About The Authors

Asheem Singh

Asheem Singh was deputy director of ResPublica and the Head of ResPublica's Civil Society and Social Innovation Unit fro...