New ResPublica Green Paper, 'Military Academies: Tackling disadvantage, improving ethos and changing outcome'
The Prime Minister is being urged to back the setting up
of a network of military schools to help tackle educational failure in the UK’s
poorest communities according to a ResPublica publication being launched today.
The ResPublica 'Green Paper' urges David Cameron to
recognise and harness the ‘unique technical and vocational expertise’ existing
in the armed forces and to use them to create a new generation of schools run
by the military that will address poor discipline and educational failure in
Britain’s most deprived neighbourhoods.
It sets out a series of recommendations Phillip
Blond says will facilitate these new schools. And calls on the Government to
support the establishment of 10 pilot academies in regional ‘NEET blackspots’,
before encouraging the development of a military academy in ‘every’ local
education authority.
The green paper, Military Academies: Tackling
Disadvantage, Improving Ethos and Changing Outcome, written by ResPublica
Director Phillip Blond, and Patricia Kaszynska, Senior Researcher at
ResPublica, is being launched in the wake of last year’s riots, which laid bare
the full extent of educational failure in Britain’s poorest communities.
“Looking at the educational background of the young
people who took part in the riots, two-thirds were classed as having some form
of special educational need (compared to 21% for the national average) more
than a third had been excluded from school during 2009-10 (this compares with
Department for Education records showing 6% exclusions for all Year 11 pupils);
and more than one in 10 of the young people appearing before courts had been
permanently excluded from school,” the paper says.
“Military Academies would open up new opportunities for
those lacking hope and aspiration; they would change the cultural and moral
outlook of those currently engulfed by hopelessness and cynicism.”
The paper recognises that the Government has already
started to think about the use of the military in the education system, but it
concludes that these are not radical enough to make a real difference.
“Both Michael Gove and Nick Clegg have highlighted the
value of military training. Mr Gove in calling for boot camps for expelled
children and Nick Clegg’s summer camps, but the Government must be much bolder,”
says Phillip Blond.
“Why should the benefits of military discipline and
training be limited to a handful of children excluded from mainstream schools,
or just two weeks a year? If the Government is serious about harnessing the
expertise and ethos of the armed forces, then they must be far more radical.”
And to re-enforce the military ethos at the schools the
report calls for the development of a fast track teaching training programme
for both service personnel and reservists similar to the highly successful US
scheme, Troops to Teach, which has helped over 9,500 veteran to qualify as
teachers and into state schools.
“Our aspiration would be to emulate the success of the
Troops to Teachers programme - a U.S. Department of Education and Department of
Defense scheme, which helps eligible military personnel begin a new career as
teachers in public schools where their skills, knowledge and experience are
most needed.
The paper recognises that these military academies could
not be staffed completely by the armed forces, but by a mix of “...qualified
teachers recruited from the existing pool in the Reserves, university students
who would favour the hybrid nature of a military and educational career, or
ex-military personnel accredited through an up-skilling programme we outline as
part of our proposal. The Academies would also recruit civilian teachers with
an intention of joining the Reserves.”
But it is the pastoral care that the paper says will mark
these schools out from more traditional models. “A military background can be a
huge asset when it comes to the delivery of pastoral care to troubled youths,”
it says.
“A US review of the successful Troops to Teachers scheme
in a report by the GAO for The US Congress revealed that over 80% of
“Troops” are men and 40% minorities...Indeed, as the US experience indicated,
the servicemen involved in school education in difficult inner-city schools are
more likely to come from the same culture and context as the students. These
factors are conducive to the development of camaraderie and mutual trust
between students and their mentors. Trust building, mentoring and pastoral
support – in addition to the delivery of extra-curricular activities and
discipline enforcement - would form the core duties for the servicemen not
directly involved in teaching.”
And the paper says that these schools will seek to
“facilitate pathways into future jobs for their students” through apprenticeships
in partnership with defence and other manufacturing firms.
It concludes by saying that developing military academies
would also benefit personnel in the armed forces, “...The aim would be to
create a number of attractive career pathways into teaching and youth
mentoring. One of many benefits of our model is that – while it is radical - it
would use already existing structures. Working in partnership with a vocational
education accrediting organisation such as City & Guilds and the Cadet
Vocational Qualification Organisation, the proposed programme would develop a
progression scheme using the new Qualifications and Credit Framework (QCF).”
The publication’s recommendations include:
· The Department for
Education should recognise the Reserve Forces’ and Cadets’ Associations as an
agent of the Armed Forces, as a sponsoring body for Academies
· Recognising that the
positive involvement of the military reserve and ex-military personnel in
schooling
· On behalf of the
Armed Forces, the Reserve Forces’ and Cadets’ Associations, should submit a
sponsorship application to the Department for Education proposing to establish
a chain of Military Academies, either by setting up new institutions or taking
over failing schools to create a military variant
· Community outreach
should be undertaken by the RFCAs in order to identify locations where local
residents might petition the Armed Forces to set up Military Academies
· Pilot scheme, local
communities should be informed about and consulted on the plan at an early
stage in order to enhance the legitimacy of the Military Academies and shape
them according to the needs of their local communities
· The Reserve Forces'
and Cadets' Associations (RFCAs) should expand and enhance its operational
capacity and establish a network of contacts with stakeholders to be involved
indirectly in facilitating the infrastructural backing for the Military
Academies, such as universities running military training units and third
sector organisations working with troubled youths and wounded personnel
· The RFCAs should
publicise the programme among present and past military personnel
· Military Academies
should be able to deliver a unique curriculum and the mentoring scheme.
· Each military
academy would be overseen by a consortium comprising experienced military
personnel, the Cadet Vocational Qualification Organisation, education
specialists and third sector organisations working with troubled youths
· The department for
Education and each academy consortium would agree clear guidance on teaching
and mentoring methods.