To coincide with the Parliamentary debate on the Government’s Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill, the latest publication
from ResPublica, Marriage: Union for the future or contract for the present,
criticises the Bill for compromising the meaning of both traditional heterosexual marriage and homosexual partnership.
Written by ResPublica Director Phillip Blond and ResPublica Fellow Professor Roger Scruton, the paper
argues that there is far more to ‘marriage’ than just its name and any changes to its deﬁnition should not be taken lightly.
Throughout the debates that followed after David Cameron's announcement in support for same sex marriage in 2011, the value and worth of marriage has been assumed rather than discussed. A meaningful discussion about the value and purpose of the institution of marriage itself has not taken place. Beyond the speciﬁcs of the Government’s proposals, this paper asks: What is marriage, and why does it matter?
The publication warns that one deﬁnition of marriage will supplant and eﬀectively erode another, and will impose norms that do not cohere with the core purpose and role of conjugal marriage.
Conjugal marriage is ﬁrst and foremost about the creation and care of children. It is about creating a public institution that celebrates and secures the right environment whereby children enter into the world, receiving from their parents the social capital that their parents in turn inherited. Traditional conjugal marriage is now under threat from a weaker conception of marriage that promotes a partnership that does not extend beyond the self-interests of the couple.
The publication argues that marriage will be seriously undermined if it is redefined so that children and the creation of new life will no longer be part of it, and urges the Government to maintain the present deﬁnition of marriage.
The publication also acknowledges that civil partnerships, while oﬀering every right that marriage presently oﬀers, lack a public recognition and celebration. It urges the Church to take a lead in endorsing and celebrating same sex relationships and recommends that churches oﬀer more than a civil partnership - a civil union - for those who wish to pursue a religious celebration and blessing. This would permit same sex couples to commit to a lifelong union on a religious basis determined by their own homosexual relationships, rather than, as paradoxically would be the case with same sex marriage, one deﬁned by the relations between heterosexual couples.
This publication is part of a multi-output ‘Strategic Consultation on Marriage
’, which sets out to explore the fundamental meaning and purpose of marriage and the family.