Filter By

Budget 2010 - Children and Families

Not the budget to end child poverty

The short answer in this short blog is No. Mr Darling has announced that families, those with one and two-year-olds will get an extra £4 a week in child tax credits, regardless of whether the recipients are single parents, cohabiting or married, repeating Labour's mantra that families come in all shapes and sizes and none is better or worse than the other. This comes into effect from 2012 onwards. 2011 would have been better, of course.

Darling is quick to impose a drastic increase on cider duties (hic) from this Sunday but for some (financial) reason, children need to wait longer than the good old apple wine. He did not mention child benefit which is already set to rise for the first child by 30p to £20.30 a week, and by 20p to £13.40 a month for the second child, starting from next month. It looks like there will be no further rises in the future. Child poverty was mentioned only once in the Budget – not as a problem, but as a success story as nearly a million children have been lifted out of poverty since 1999. But the promise to end child poverty by 2020 still seems likely to be broken. And the target for this year – to halve the number of children in poverty – is already being missed, by more than half a million children who live in poverty, affecting their health, life chances and happiness. The cost of child poverty is high – it is estimated to stand at £25bn per year – so the fight against it should be part of the plan for economic recovery, not something that can be treated on the sidelines.

On the plus side they were no cuts announced that seem to have a detrimental effect on children and their situation. And £4 more per week is much better than the £20 rise in the child tax credit per year, announced in last year's Budget and condemned by child poverty campaigners. However, tackling child poverty no longer seems to be a priority for this Government.

Comments on: Budget 2010 - Children and Families

Gravatar Maurice 24 March 2010
Dear Sandra,

I thought the Conservative position was that income transfer was less important to alleviating child poverty than nebulous 'other' factors.

Have you now disavowed this position?

Regards,

Maurice
Reply
Gravatar Sandra 24 March 2010
Dear Maurice,

I never had a Conservative position on this in the first place.
However, income transfer is just one of many building blocks to alleviate poverty but nevertheless important.

Best wishes,
Sandra
Reply

Join the discussion Have opinions on this matter? Why not get involved and comment on this below.

Become a Member Joining ResPublica give you an exclusive amount of features. Gain early access to ResPublica events, contribute to topics and much more.

Detailed Summary

About The Authors

Sandra Gruescu

Dr Sandra Gruescu led ResPublica's work around children and families policy from January 2010 until August 2011.  S...