Filter By

Beyond Paper: Money 3.0

The Future of Money, Part Two: with the budget exactly a week away, Guest Contributor Chris Cook reports on radical innovations in digital cash

Chris' report arose from the first post from ResPublica's Civil Society and Social Innovation Unit in its 'Future of Money' series. That post concentrated on peer-to-peer lending and loan sharking, engendered some thought-provoking responses and can be found here

***

It has been a long time since I attended an event as stimulating as last week's 13th Digital Money Forum in London where my contribution was to briefly outline a future Money 3.0 financial architecture where banks evolve from being credit middlemen to a role as managers of direct 'Peer to Peer' credit creation.

While predictions are difficult, particularly about the future, actual developments on the ground are proceeding at a phenomenal pace in the developing world. Speaker after speaker outlined how different countries are converging in their use of mobile phones for payments.

Where The Money Is

When asked why he robbed banks, Willie Sutton famously replied.....'because that's where the money is'. But in the developing world, banks are typically few and far between, ATMs are even rarer, and including alternative money transmitters like Western Union even rudimentary access to cash and payment services is difficult at best. Other banking services like credit are practically non-existent other than from local money-lenders at usurious rates.

Mobile telephone companies are moving into this financial services vacuum at a phenomenal rate. All of them establish networks of air-time re-sellers, typically local shops and agents, and users make pre-payments for mobile phone use. This in itself has had interesting side effects; one major African operator was obliged by an Central Bank to cease selling high value Phone Cards, because these were routinely being used as currency, and – to add insult to injury – holding their value better than the Central Bank issued notes.

A Ghanaian mobile payment provider outlined how conventional access to cash is available in Ghana from only around 2,000 locations, for a population of 23 million: whereas his network alone (with over 50% of the mobile phone market and over 8 million subscribers) already has, through its network of re-sellers, 300,000 points of presence, accessible to 90% of the population.

Using cheap and cheerful basic mobile phones even the least educated people can simply and easily make micro-payments to each other by text message or Bluetooth, and deposit and withdraw cash, via the network of agents.

While in other countries mobile 'Telcos' either partner with or even buy their own banks to facilitate micro-payments, this Ghanaian operator's shrewd approach is to work with nine banks initially, all of whom were queuing up for the aggregated 'micro' deposits.

In Colombia, a new service provider's business model is simply to bring a bank together with a Telco and the tens of thousands of local 'Mom and Pop' shops which underpin Colombia's economy. Perhaps the best known example is Safaricom's MPESA payment system in Kenya, which had 15 million subscribers by the end of 2009, and is now branching out into areas such as crop insurance.

Credit where it's due

The point I was making in my presentation was that there is no reason why the shop resellers who sell airtime - and who take in cash deposits and provide access to cash as part of the mobile money service - should not dispense with cash and receive and extend interest-free (but not cost free) credit from and to customers instead.

Such credit may be created and settled within a credit clearing union architecture. All that is required for this is a mutual guarantee agreement, similar to a credit union's 'common bond'; a service provider (banking as a profession) to set and manage guarantee limits and defaults; and an accounting system.

Such credit clearing has been routine between tens of thousands of Swiss businesses since 1934 on the WIR credit clearing system. More recently, in Ecuador, the FactoRepo system currently under development will enable VAT-registered businesses to discount their invoices directly with the Central Bank and thereby free up working capital. Neither Swiss Francs nor Dollars, respectively, actually change hands in these systems: instead credit obligations of businesses (trade credit) is simply used in payment of other obligations within a framework of trust, the WIR's being private, and FactoRepo's, public. The Swiss Franc and the Dollar are used only as the pricing reference or value standard.

Fast Forward

I believe that within a remarkably short time the developing world will be using mobile payment utilities at a minute fraction of the cost of the baroque and outrageously expensive bank-centric legacy systems in the developed world. It will only be a matter of time before such systems spread virally here, too.

The enabling factor for pervasive spread in the First World will be forms of credit and currency which are based upon a new approach to investment in the use value of land/location, and of energy, both of which are almost universally acceptable in exchange.

But that is another story, and awaits the further decomposition of our terminally dysfunctional financial system of 'Zombie' banks.

Comments on: Beyond Paper: Money 3.0

Gravatar Melvin Carvalho 06 February 2012
95% of the money in the world is as debt in the for of an IOU.

It used to be modeled on paper but now can be recorded digitally. In particular, on the Web.

I have written up a 2 page spec that allows P2P credits to be modeled at web scale..

http://webcredits.org/

Arbitrarily many workflows, apps and UIs can be layeree on top.
Reply
Gravatar James Mackintosh 17 March 2010
Surely all that is happening when the phone companies issue credits which can be traded is that the entire monetary system becomes dependent on the creditworthiness of the companies? If customers do not recognise that the new "money" they are using could be wiped out by failure of the issuer, they need educating. It may involve lower money transfer fees, but the trade-off is the possibility of losing everything.

It also involves governments giving up control of interest rates, and so of the economy - hence the example you give of bans on high-value cards (which country was this, by the way? Sounds interesting).

As to widespread issuance of credit by shops: the WIR example is instructive. It almost went bust in 1939 due to bad debts, and it was already subject to banking regulations by then. Imagine the impact if shopkeepers are suddenly trusted to enforce lending standards - a recession takes out the country's retail facilities (bad debts), as they would have no capital reserves to cover the losses. Unless they are made subject to bank laws requiring reserves: in which case you are just proposing a lightly-regulated, badly trained workforce of distributed bank credit controllers, which seems like a very bad idea.

There are clearly micro-payment systems which new technologies can allow to be run more cheaply than legacy banks (phones, PayPal etc), but governments should regulate them, require reserves - 100% reserves - against "money" issuance, and certainly not allow them into the credit business. Microfinance initiatives can also be a good thing, as is widely documented - but they should not be money transfer organisations.
Reply
Gravatar Chris Cook 17 March 2010
James

Thanks for a thoughtful and knowledgable response.

However, there are certain assumptions implicit in what you say which do not apply to a dis-intermediated economy of Peer to Peer Finance and the Money 3.0 which is the outcome.

Consider first Credit which I think of as 'time to pay'.

The source of credit is actually the capability of a borrower or buyer to provide something of value in exchange in the future. The economic function of a bank is in fact to step between trade seller and trade buyer or between lender (depositor) and borrower and to guarantee that the credit of the buyer or borrower is good.

A bank operates as a credit intermediary or middleman therefore, and provides a 'framework of trust' for exchange transactions on credit terms.

The 'Peer to Peer' architecture I propose has no middleman who 'issues' credit, whether a private bank, a Central Bank or even a Treasury - as proposed by the advocates of 'Social Credit' eg Alberta Treasury Branches survive in Canada to this day as part of a conventional state-owned bank.

The logic is that governments, too, will evolve from middlemen to facilitators.

The WIR also has a central issuer - the WIR Bank - who issues Swiss Franc 'look-alike' credits, and manages the system, with a framework of trust provided by security taken over WIR members' property. This pragmatic 'property-backed' structure probably accounts for the longevity of the WIR.

In a P2P credit model both sellers and buyers on credit terms transact directly subject to a mutual framework of trust which I call a 'Guarantee Society'. System costs are shared by subscription, and the framework of trust provided by provisions (Guarantee Charges) made by both seller AND buyer into a Default Pool held in common ownership by a Custodian entity.

Service-Providers-Formerly-Known-As-Banks - not the shops or other participants - will manage the system in partnership with providers of the IT and communications platform. They will adminsietr the system; set guarantee limits and handle defaults in accordance with agreed policies.

Netting and settlement of bilateral credit and debit balances will take place either directly, or indirectly using a settlement agent mechanism such as Ripple.

So while Telco phone companies (and utilities) will certainly be important participants in the system - to the extent that their credit units could become one form of currency circulating - their credit would constitute 'money's worth' which would circulate alongside credits issued by the likes of Tesco, Boots, and other businesses.

The key point is that all of these exchanges require a Unit of measure or Value Standard which may be distinct from the money's worth of goods and services which circulates on credit terms by reference to this standard.

To begin with, people will probably use the $, £ or € as a reference point, but I think that in fact a Unit of energy is something to which most people can better relate.

In the WIR, money's worth circulates not FOR 'fiat' Swiss Francs but BY REFERENCE TO the Swiss Franc as an abstract Value Standard which everyone understands.

Finally, I think that we will see the evolution - through what I call direct 'Peer to Peer Investment' in productive assets - of Units of pretty much universally acceptable currency redeemable in land rental value (as suggested by John Law in 1705) or in the use value of energy.




Reply
Gravatar James Mackintosh 17 March 2010
Surely all that is happening when the phone companies issue credits which can be traded is that the entire monetary system becomes dependent on the creditworthiness of the companies? If customers do not recognise that the new "money" they are using could be wiped out by failure of the issuer, they need educating. It may involve lower money transfer fees, but the trade-off is the possibility of losing everything.

It also involves governments giving up control of interest rates, and so of the economy - hence the example you give of bans on high-value cards (which country was this, by the way? Sounds interesting).

As to widespread issuance of credit by shops: the WIR example is instructive. It almost went bust in 1939 due to bad debts, and it was already subject to banking regulations by then. Imagine the impact if shopkeepers are suddenly trusted to enforce lending standards - a recession takes out the country's retail facilities (bad debts), as they would have no capital reserves to cover the losses. Unless they are made subject to bank laws requiring reserves: in which case you are just proposing a lightly-regulated, badly trained workforce of distributed bank credit controllers, which seems like a very bad idea.

There are clearly micro-payment systems which new technologies can allow to be run more cheaply than legacy banks (phones, PayPal etc), but governments should regulate them, require reserves - 100% reserves - against "money" issuance, and certainly not allow them into the credit business. Microfinance initiatives can also be a good thing, as is widely documented - but they should not be money transfer organisations.
Reply
Gravatar Tijuana 17 March 2010
Lol :)
Reply
Gravatar Chris Cook 17 March 2010
Cheers TJ.

Just not the Post-Bureaucratic Age...! That's almost as bad as Post-Autistic Economics.....
Reply
Gravatar Tijuana 17 March 2010
Excellent report, thanks Chris.

The development and poverty fighting opportunities inherent in theses systems are too exciting for words.

I am trying to think of a name that ties it all together - the super-industrial revolution perhaps?

TJ
Reply

Join the discussion Have opinions on this matter? Why not get involved and comment on this below.

Become a Member Joining ResPublica give you an exclusive amount of features. Gain early access to ResPublica events, contribute to topics and much more.

Detailed Summary

Date Published
17 March 2010

Categories
credit union
development
economy
innovation
international
peer to peer

About The Authors