Filter By

Better Save than Sorry? Family Finances After the Emergency Budget

Sandra Gruescu mourns the death of the Saving Gateway and would like to see the Child Benefit means-tested

The biggest surprise of the Emergency Budget for me was the announcement that the Saving Gateway, a scheme designed to help people on low income to kick-start a saving habit, is being scrapped. This is highly unfortunate. A report evaluating its effectiveness stated that the scheme ‘was highly popular with research participants, many of whom reported a number of positive outcomes and benefits from taking part. Significant proportions saved for the first time and continue to save even after the scheme ended (61 per cent continue to be regular savers, and 60 per cent agree they save more regularly as a result of taking part in the scheme). The majority agreed that they had learned specifically about how interest rates and banks operate and agreed that their knowledge of financial products had increased as a result of the scheme. Attesting to the popularity of the pilot, 98% would open another Saving Gateway account if offered and 99% would recommend it to a friend.'

The Saving Gateway scheme generated both new savers as well as new savings. As did the Child Trust Fund. However, both schemes are scrapped, leaving savers in limbo. I really don't know why anybody would save these days, with interest rates being so low. But – given the huge savings and asset crisis we have in the UK – scrapping those two schemes against the background of low interest rates and little trust in banks can only be called a move in the wrong direction.

George Osbourne has also announced that all benefits and tax credits (except pensions and pension credits) will move in line with the CPI rather than the RPI. The Consumer Prices Index (CPI) and the Retail Prices Index (RPI), published each month by the UK Office for National Statistics, are the main measures used in the UK to record changes in the level of the prices most people pay for goods and services. CPI and RPI tend to have different values because there are slight differences in what goods and services they cover, and how they are calculated. For example, the CPI excludes certain housing costs, such as mortgage interest payments and council tax. The new policy means that in the future benefits and tax credits are more likely to rise more slowly as the CPI is more often below the RPI, rather than not. Currently, the CPI stands at 3.4% and the RPI at 5.1%. Every person on benefits will be affected by this.

The good news is that the Child Element in the Child Tax Credit will increase by £150 above inflation from April next year. This will help the poorest families. However, although this is an anti-poverty measure in the short run, this will not create any new assets as was the intention with the Savings Gateway and the Child Trust Fund. At the same time, the Child Benefit is frozen for three years. This policy is totally out of place with the announcement that all benefits are moving in line with the CPI - so why is the Child Benefit an exception? I guess because they had no time to figure out how to means test it – the only sensible solution regarding the Child Benefit payments. Freezing the Child Benefit means less money in real terms for the poorer families and still a hand out for the better off who hardly notice those payments in their bank accounts.

Comments on: Better Save than Sorry? Family Finances After the Emergency Budget

Gravatar Matthew Kalman 29 June 2010
Hi Adam,r/>r/>According to my tentatively proposed new-fangled definition of 'progressive', we currently just haven't got a clue yet whether most policies are in fact 'progressive' or not.r/>r/>We're almost entirely in the dark, flying blind...r/>r/>I don't know of anyone who is looking directly (ie empirically) at how major government policies impact 'adult development' characteristics such as empathy, autonomy, values and cognitive complexity - which the OECD has suggested is a key to our success in the Digital age. (Even better if there's a control group!).r/>r/>For all we know, we may be damaging self-responsibility, autonomy, empathy with many policies.r/>r/>Fragments of the kind of thing I'm talking about do come up, I believe, to an extent – say in the work Frank Field, or Ian Duncan-Smith, are doing – but I feel that we could be explicitly measuring the impact of policies across this range of these internal (adult development-related) domains.r/>r/>Or at least try it once – in some depth – to see what we might be missing out on, or inadvertently causing.r/>r/>You can read about an interesting "natural experiment" where some Latin American squatters gained property titles and others didn't - and the effect this change in ownership had on their beliefs here: http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/5649.html (shorter article) and here: http://www.people.hbs.edu/rditella/papers/QJEBeliefs.pdf (academic paper).r/>r/>Not being a policy wonk, I don't even really know where best to look for such impact studies for the UK...r/>r/>I remember some years back Geoff Mulgan urged a No.10 meeting of the Government's top future strategists to try to make Government policies more 'Integral' – ie ensuring they equally focus on the four elements of the individual's intentional and behavioural changes and the group's cultural and systems/organisational changes.r/>He urged them to read Ken Wilber's book 'A Theory of Everything: An Integral Vision for Business, Politics, Science and Spirituality'.r/>r/>Of course, this change to future policies never happened – though a few of the strategists were interested....r/>r/>Perhaps what I'm calling for is that we don't just measure the usual visible external changes (in behaviours, systems, outputs) but that we *must* also measure the 'invisible' changes that make up the other half of reality: ie the individual's intentions/mindsets/values/action logics etc and the group's shared cultural mindsets.r/>r/>Matthew Kalmanr/>r/>PS And just to confuse things, I believe some of the traits of healthy adult development (that we might want to foster, rather than inadvertently suppress) don't just simply incrementally increase - but are more curvilinear. Conformism and conscientiousness might be two such traits...r/>r/>r/>r/>
Reply
Gravatar Matthew Kalman 24 June 2010
I just posted this comment about a new - better? - way to assess the impact of the Budget, on Matthew Taylor's RSA blog. But I think it might well be equally relevant to ResPublica's goals, so – unless you don't like such cross-posting – here it is. Let me know if I'm barking up the wrong tree...r/>r/>ISN'T IT TIME TO REDEFINE 'PROGRESSIVE' (BUDGETS, POLICIES ETC) AS THOSE WHICH MOST HELP PEOPLE GROW UP THROUGH CIRCLES OF EMPATHIC AUTONOMY?r/>r/>Hi Matthew,r/>r/>I just thought of a little test to see how seriously you are really taking your ideas of 21st Century Enlightenment... ;-)r/>r/>You argue that this should include deepening autonomy, deeper self-awareness, empathy, universalism etc.r/>r/>As you know, the researchers in the field of Adult Development have been measuring the growth of exactly these kinds of capacities in people for many decades now (see Kegan, Loevinger, Kohlberg, Commons, Wilber, Torbert, Beck, Fischer, Maslow, Dade et al).r/>r/>Isn't the real test of any 'progressive' policy - or Budget! - whether it helps or hinders progress through these stages of ever-increasing empathic autonomy?r/>r/>This is an empirical question, that barely anyone is asking... yet!r/>r/>Isn't it time to redefine 'Progressive' policies by looking - longitudinally - at how effective they are at increasing empathy and autonomy etc?r/>r/>It's not like this stuff is entirely off the agenda - Canada's Chief Statistician T. Scott Murray in an OECD report talked about the need for 'reliable measures of [Robert Kegan style?] complexity... for use in a household survey context'.r/>r/>That would certainly be a step towards the kind of longitudinal empirical foundation we might need in order to be able to follow the effects of political policies on empathic autonomy.r/>r/>Possibly some of the work of Harrison ('The Central Liberal Truth') and his colleagues worldwide might be taking this kind of wider look at the effects of policies too...r/>r/>Matthew K
Reply
Gravatar Adam Schoenborn 24 June 2010
Matthew, r/>r/>This is an interesting definition of progressive. Presumably, if "the real test of any 'progressive' policy - or Budget! - whether it helps or hinders progress through these stages of ever-increasing empathic autonomy?", then you wouldn't consider the emergency budget a progressive budget - even if it lives up to George Osborne's claim that it asked the rich to pay more, as well as proportionally more? r/>r/>
Reply

Join the discussion Have opinions on this matter? Why not get involved and comment on this below.

Become a Member Joining ResPublica give you an exclusive amount of features. Gain early access to ResPublica events, contribute to topics and much more.

Detailed Summary

About The Authors

Sandra Gruescu

Dr Sandra Gruescu led ResPublica's work around children and families policy from January 2010 until August 2011.  S...