x

Join our Mailing List

Subscribe to our mailing list to receive regular email updates of ResPublica's work, upcoming events and recent blogs from the Disraeli Room.

The Disraeli Room

The Disraeli Room

Blog Post

Student Debt: Abandon All Hope?

23rd January 2014

Michelle Highman, Chief Executive of The Money Charity, highlights the hidden costs of attending University

Much has been written over the last fifteen years, since University tuition fees were first introduced, about the rights and the wrongs of asking graduates to pay back society for their degrees. Whatever your views on the best way in which this should be done, most commentators and all political parties now agree that a free University education is consigned to the history books.

The current system, has its problems, but it does mean that no young person will be prohibited from getting a University education simply because they and their families can’t afford the tuition fees upfront. It’s clear, however, that in some quarters, that message still isn’t resonating. Student Finance is complicated – it’s not a standard loan nor a standard tax. It can be written off after 30 years, but can be sold as debt to a private company. And perhaps least well known by most young people and their parents, it attracts a commercial interest rate from the moment the loan is taken out (rather than upon graduation, as most presume). Meaning that an average student could easily borrow £45,000 pounds say, but will actual pay back £135,000 over nearly 29 years of their working lives. In our example the final payment will have risen to over £750 a month, before the debt is finally repaid.

The common response to this is that there is no need to worry, as you won’t pay anything back at all if you never earn over £21,000, but that doesn’t feel like a hugely positive life goal for a recent graduate to aspire to!

So on the assumption that we want our graduates to aim to earn over £21,000 and that many of them indeed will, this clearly is not something to be taken lightly. With rising graduate unemployment, and the differential between salaries paid to those who have degrees and those who don’t narrowing, there are those from all financial backgrounds, who are questioning the need for a degree at such a price.

Even repayments of £100 or £200 a month (so those on approximately £35,000 or £48,000 respectively) are a significant reduction from a young person’s take home pay. £100 a month less they can afford to pay on their rent, save towards a deposit for a flat or to protect their futures. And at that rate, the debt will never be paid pack, so it’s £100 pound a month they will pay for 30 years.

So, what can we do about all this? The short answer from many people, is probably not a lot. As set out at the beginning of this piece, the basic premise isn’t going to change any time soon and the country needs to continue to encourage its talent to graduate.

At The Money Charity however, we think there are a number of practical things we can do, which whilst they won’t solve the problem, may help. First and foremost, we need to ensure that all young people grow up having received a quality financial education. The inclusion of financial education on the curriculum from September 2014 is an important step forward but much more needs to be done to get the implementation right. The Money Charity delivers its Money Workshops in schools and colleges across England, Wales and Northern Ireland, and its on track to reach its target of 100,000 young people at some point this year.

Secondly we need to make sure, that as young people become students they have the information and advice they need to start to manage their money well and live independently for the first time. Managing your money sensibly whilst you’re a student may not eliminate your student debt, but it can minimise it. Each year, The Money Charity produces the Student MoneyManual – the free essential guide to Student Finance and managing money as a student. It’s a must read for anyone thinking about higher education, and is packed with money saving tips and ideas for all students.

But managing money for the first time is complex and the government needs to play its part too. So the third practical thing we can do for the next generation of students is to change the way student finance is paid. That is why The Money Charity proudly backs the campaign for monthly payments of student finance.

Paying students monthly rather than termly would help students manage their money more effectively whilst at university, help them learn to budget and perhaps most crucially would normalise monthly budgeting habits, mirroring the way we are paid once in work. This in turn would help them to develop valuable habits and behaviours to employ after they leave university and for the rest of their lives.

For most students, their first term’s payment is the biggest amount of money they’ve ever seen, so the temptation to spend unwisely is huge. Monthly payments would also reduce the risk of temptation, meaning students would be unable to blow the lot in the first weeks or month. Most adults would struggle if they were paid three month’s wages in one go, and asked to live on them for the next three months. So why do we ask our students to do just that? At The Money Charity we do everything we can to help students get to grips with good money management, it is time that the government does the same.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.

The Disraeli Room
ResPublica’s Response to the Industrial Strategy White Paper

Following the creation of the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy in July 2016 and firing the starting gun for a string of sector...

The Disraeli Room
ResPublica’s Response to the Autumn Budget 2017

The second Budget of 2017 delivered by Philip Hammond following the abolition of the Autumn Statement, was widely trailed as a tight political tightrope for...

Child Protection in the Digital Age

I was delighted when the Government introduced its Digital Economy Bill in the last session which gave effect to the 2015 General Election manifesto commitment...

A stake in it for everyone; why Conservatives should support regulation of Fixed Odds Betting Terminals

FOBTs or B2 machines are highly addictive, one way we know this, according to research conducted by the Campaign for Fairer Gambling, is that FOBT...

Championing renewed leadership in governance and business practice

It didn’t get to the point where we saw ‘Save Unilever’ held aloft on placards outside Downing Street, yet there was widespread unease about Kraft’s...

Industrial Strategy: A positive start but more must be done

The Government revealed their industrial strategy this week, with three main aims: Build on our strengths and extend excellence into the future; Close the gap...

Who can give the modern Cathy a home?

It’s 50 years since Ken Loach’s groundbreaking film, Cathy Come Home, documented the inhuman effects of homelessness. Without a home, as his heartbreaking film shows,...

We need a manufacturing resurgence more than ever. How can we bring it about?

There’s been a familiar narrative emerging since Thursday’s vote – this was the left behind white working class getting one over the London-centric political and...

The economic impacts of a Brexit would make us more, not less, reliant on other countries

Yesterday’s letter from Ford to its employees was the latest chapter in the economic debate on Britain’s EU membership, which has largely focused on the...