Filter By

Disraeli Room

Transparency and the "messy business" of international aid

"... Demonstrating value, particularly social value, is a notoriously complex and time-consuming process. The Guardian's Madeleine Bunting points out that “many crucial issues in government can't easily be measured in monetary terms”, with particular reference to aid which goes to strengthening civil society and governance. This is undoubtedly true, yet many imperfect measures, such as those used to determine inflation or economic growth, are both necessary and useful to the policy process ..."

5
Going off-grid

"... I was invited to record a phone-in with TalkSport recently because their three million listeners, who tend to be male and from a lower socio-economic background, have been spontaneously talking about going off-grid.  “I’ve had enough of this,” they are saying on the late-night chat shows. “I’m going off-grid.” At first it was one or two a month, my interviewer told me.  But now it's a few every week ..." 

145
Devolving monetary policy?

"... Are we in a danger of creating a scenario where London, like Berlin, is left to bail out ‘fiscally reckless’ communities, and - like the Germans - we are left to argue that the system is sound as long as the big ones are safe? ..."

4
In defense of the Hereditary Peerage, Part 2

"... What could be more egalitarian than having both the 17th Duke of Norfolk, who is also the 36th Earl of Arundel, and the successful daughter of a middle-class grocer raised to a Baroness share the upper house and be equalised in status in the House in Lords, and in the country in general as subjects of a common monarch? Why should class-based meritocracy (one that rewards achievement with the prospect of social class mobility) be less respect-worthy than income-based meritocracy, when it is the latter wherein much of our problems begin and end? ..."

83
In defence of the Hereditary Peerage, Part 1

"... The very notion of hereditary succession seems to go against all the democratic values presently privileged and represents all that is unfair and outdated about our system. The aim here, however, is to pause for a moment and deliberately ride against the tide by looking into the many benefits the presence of unelected, particularly hereditary, peers in the House of Lords brings to the nation and ask if it is in our interest to remove them from the Lords so hastily ..."

90
WikiRiots

"... If the new generation are guilty of anything, it may be that their expectations are too high - because not only have they inherited the cost of the previous generations’ lifestyle, but also many of their ambitions. For the new generation to succeed, they will need to first demand these changes but must also seek to maintain them through participation in a way that is equitable, consistent and most importantly, realistic ..."

28
The "How Big?" Society

"... The inability of big state institutions to collect and interpret the information necessary to effectively plan flows of capital was one of the key downfalls of the socialist dream of a planned political economy. If anything the flow of population poses an even bigger challenge to state planners, since unlike money people have free will and are far harder to account for in objective terms. Yet despite all this it seems that governments are willing, if not eager, to impose centralised controls on migration in the public interest ..."

12
Lords reform: A century in the making Part 2

"... A wholly elected House of Lords would challenge the supremacy of the House of Commons enabling it to justifiably claim authority to hold government to account and to represent the people. For the public, this might endow the Lords and Commons with equal legitimacy. The houses would cease to complement each other and would start to compete, with the Lords more likely to exercise its full powers. Put simply, two wholly elected chambers runs contrary to the correct operation of our parliamentary system and would require a complete re-evaluation of the function and purpose of the House of Lords ..."

11
Do the social sciences matter?

"... Traditionally academics have seemed to favor a value-neutral approach to the social sciences (something brought over from the natural sciences), and altering this with prescriptions about what should or should not be done seems to be significant barrier to academic engagement in the policy process. However, without a practical purpose social science becomes an end in its own right, rather than a means to something bigger ..."

8
Lords reform: A century in the making Part 1

"... Following the removal of all but 92 of the hereditary peers in 1999 (there is surely some irony that the 92 hereditary peers are the only democratically elected element in the upper house!), the House of Lords has become noticeably more confident and effective. With an increased sense of legitimacy, the Lords has defeated government legislation more than 500 times since 1999 and has become more insistent upon legislative amendment, which is good for democracy and for the quality of legislation ..."

34

Join ResPublica

Join the conversation

By becoming a ResPublica member, you will have the opportunity to make your own contribution to our work, with opportunities to interact with ResPublica’s policy team and some of the most influential thinkers in British politics and business. Join us here

Most Commented

Anarchism As Management Theory

Liam Barrington-Bush of Concrete Solutions on learning from self-organised social movements

163 By Liam Barrington-Bush

Latest From Twitter